Government

Government sites may be for the people, but they don’t work for all.

When we asked several members of the disability community about their experience with state and federal government websites, each one shared a similar story.

Government sites tend to be less accessible than the private industry (or, as one member of the disability community put it, “atrocious across the board”), which can be especially problematic because there usually isn’t an alternative. If they need to file a police report or register to vote, there’s only one place to go. And if that site isn’t accessible, they’re stuck.

Stylized billboard for the Government industry with a subheading that reads “No Tab Order”

“I had to go on the immigration website about a year ago. The first page was pretty accessible. But the second I needed to put in a case number, check statuses or change addresses, it broke down pretty quickly.”

Christina Campbell | AudioEye A11iance Member

EXPERT AUDITS

Breaking down the most significant barriers on the top government sites.

After reviewing the top government sites for things like healthcare and retirement benefits, our expert testers noted that keyboard accessibility issues made it difficult to look up information, log into personal accounts, or submit official documents.

On average, our testers found another 10 accessibility barriers across the pages tested, which included account profiles and contact pages — including three consistent barriers that impacted their ability to use government services.

  1. 1. No audible announcement when forms were missing required information.

    Our experts found a number of forms that did not audibly announce when required information was missing, which can leave non-sighted customers unaware that their form was not submitted. Instead, the page simply reloaded with no announcement that a form was missing required information.

    WCAG Criteria: 3.3.1: Error Identification;Opens in a new tab3.3.2: Labels or InstructionsOpens in a new tab

    Disabilities Affected: Visual, Cognitive

  2. 2. Unclear labels made it difficult for non-sighted users to navigate between pages.

    Our experts encountered numerous links that lacked descriptive labels to aid in navigation (for example: a series of consecutive links were all labeled “learn more,” instead of informing users that one link pointed to small business coverage and another to Medicaid coverage.

    WCAG Criteria: 4.1.2: Name, Role, Value;Opens in a new tab2.4.4: Link Purpose (In Context)Opens in a new tab

    Disabilities Affected: Visual, Cognitive

  3. 3. Keyboard-only navigation was a consistent challenge across sites.

    Our experts noted a number of keyboard accessibility issues that can impact site navigation, such as an inability to use arrow keys to tab between page sections (the most widely used method of navigation for screen reader users).

    WCAG Criteria: 2.1.1: Keyboard AccessibilityOpens in a new tab

    Disabilities Affected: Visual, Cognitive

“For some government websites, you can tell they’ve put a lot of work into accessibility. And for others, it’s like they just threw things together and whatever happens, happens.”

Jennifer Piening | AudioEye A11iance Member

AUTOMATED SCAN RESULTS

Most common issues, government sites.

Government sites struggled in a number of key areas that made it difficult for people with disabilities to access online services, obtain information, and fill out required forms and information.

Pie chart representing 63%. The pie chart is in the shape of a construction road sign.

63% of government pages had at least one interactive element that could not be manipulated by keyboard.

Many of these barriers affected user actions like tabbing between form fields, closing pop-up windows, or pressing ‘Submit’ buttons.

WCAG Success Criteria: 1.1.1: Non-Text ContentOpens in a new tab

Disabilities Affected: Visual, Cognitive

Pie chart representing 62%. The pie chart is in the shape of a construction road sign.

62% of government pages had at least one image with missing or inadequate alt text.

Without descriptive alt text on product photos and other graphics, people with visual and cognitive disabilities can have a hard time understanding what an image is supposed to illustrate.

WCAG Success Criteria: 1.1.1: Non-Text ContentOpens in a new tab

Disabilities Affected: Visual, Cognitive

Pie chart representing 48%. The pie chart is in the shape of a construction road sign.

48% of government pages with a form had at least one field that was not labeled.

Without descriptive field labels, it can be difficult for people with visual and cognitive impairments to obtain government services, such as registering to vote, applying for benefits programs, or filing taxes.

WCAG Success Criteria: 3.3.2: Labels or InstructionsOpens in a new tab

Disabilities Affected: Visual, Cognitive

“In general, government sites lag behind the private industry. Even making a required payment for my business can be hard.”

TJ Olsen | AudioEye A11iance Member and QA Tester

Discover how close your government site is to WCAG conformance.

Uncover accessibility barriers that cannot be found by automation alone with an Expert Audit of your most important pages.

Back: Insurance

Next: Methodology