Study: AudioEye detects up to 2.5x more issues than other tools

Get Report
Blog
Accessibility

Accessibility in UX Design: Guidelines and Training

Accessible UX design principles help digital content creators create digital content that's accessible to individuals with disabilities. Discover the guiding principles of accessible UX and how to implement them when building digital experiences.

Author: Sojin Rank, Director, Brand & Design

Published: 01/12/2024

Large stylized web page next to three smaller web browsers and the accessibility person symbol.

Good UX design solves problems for users. Accessible UX design solves problems for all users, including the one in four U.S. adults living with a disability

Yet,  many of the most-visited websites still contain significant accessibility UX design barriers (most webpages contain an average of 297 accessibility barriers), resulting in the exclusion of millions of people from content and services they have every right to access.

This is where accessibility UX design tools and principles come into play. Following these principles ensures your site is accessible to all, regardless of their ability.

What is Accessibility in UX Design?

Accessibility in UX design means creating digital experiences that people with disabilities can perceive, navigate, and interact with on equal terms. It applies WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines(opens in a new tab)) as the technical standard and is organized around four core principles: Perceivable, Operable, Understandable, and Robust, known as the POUR framework. Accessible UX benefits all users, reduces legal risk, and is required by laws including the Americans with Disabilities Act(opens in a new tab) (ADA), the European Accessibility Act, and Section 508.

It is not a separate design discipline, rather a quality standard that runs through every design decision, from how a page is laid out to how error messages are written.

The most important thing to understand about accessible UX design is that its benefits extend far beyond users with permanent disabilities. 

  • Captions help users watching video in a noisy environment.

  • High-contrast text helps users on a phone screen in direct sunlight.

  • Keyboard navigation helps power users who never touch a mouse.

These benefits are often called the curb-cut effect: accessibility features built for one group end up improving the experience for everyone.

Accessible UX design is also a legal requirement for most organizations. Laws, including Title II and Title III of the ADA, the European Accessibility Act (EAA), and Section 508, all reference WCAG as the technical standard digital products must meet. Non-compliance carries real consequences, which can include ADA fines and litigation.

To help your business avoid penalties, you’ll need to be mindful of two components: Your website’s accessibility and usability. 

Web browser showing the accessibility logo being edited.

Accessibility vs. Usability: Understanding the Difference

Usability and accessibility are related but distinct. 

Usability focuses on how efficiently and intuitively a product can be used by its intended audience. It asks: Can users complete tasks quickly and without confusion? Usability testing often helps catch points of friction for your average user.

However, a highly usable interface can still be completely inaccessible. For example, an interface with no keyboard navigation may feel smooth and intuitive to mouse users, while being entirely unusable for someone with a motor disability.

That’s where accessibility testing comes into play.

Accessibility tests ask a different question: can all users complete those tasks, including those using assistive technologies like screen readers, switch access devices, or voice recognition software? An accessibility test typically catches barriers for users who are too often excluded from usability testing altogether.

The goal is to achieve both usability and accessibility, or in other words, a product that is efficient and intuitive to use, and accessible to everyone who needs to use it.

Implementing the POUR Framework is a great step towards achieving this goal.

The POUR Framework: The Four Principles of Accessible UX Design

If you’re familiar with WCAG (the current international standard for web accessibility), then you may have heard of the POUR framework.

POUR is an acronym for four core design principles: 

  1. Perceivable

  2. Operable

  3. Understandable

  4. Robust

Every WCAG success criterion maps to one of these principles and serves as the foundation for accessible UX design.

Principle

What it Means for Designers

Common UX Applications

Perceivable

Users must be able to perceive all content and interface elements, regardless of their sensory abilities.

Alt text for images, captions for video, sufficient color contrast, text resizable without loss of function

Operable

All interactive elements and navigation must be operable without a mouse or within specific time constraints.

Full keyboard navigation, visible focus indicators, skip navigation links, no keyboard traps, no seizure-triggering animations

Understandable

Content, navigation, and error messages must be clear enough for users to understand and recover from mistakes.

Plain language, consistent navigation patterns, clear form labels, accessible error messages, predictable page behavior

Robust

Content must work reliably across current and future browsers, devices, and assistive technologies.

Valid semantic HTML, ARIA roles used correctly, tested with real screen readers

Competitive data on this page was collected as of November 1, 2023 and is subject to change or update. AudioEye does not make any representations as to the completeness or accuracy of the information on this page.

Keep in mind that these four principles are not a checklist; they are a design philosophy.

The most common accessibility failures in UX happen when one of these is treated as optional or addressed only at the end of the design process. Building POUR into your design processes from the start is how you avoid expensive retrofits later.

Accessibility UX Design Guidelines

The following guidelines will help you translate the POUR framework into practical decisions across six key areas of UX design.

1. Visual Design

Visual design choices (color, contrast, typography, layout, etc.) are where the majority of accessibility barriers originate. WCAG Success Criterion 1.4.3(opens in a new tab) requires a minimum color contrast ratio of 4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text. A color contrast checker, like this one from AudioEye, can help verify the accessibility of your palette before finalizing designs.

Best Practices for UX Design:

  • Use high-contrast color schemes: Avoid relying on color alone to convey meaning; instead, pair color with text labels, patterns, or icons. 

  • Choose legible, readable typefaces: Avoid decorative or highly stylized fonts for body text. (Text should be resizable up to 200% without loss of content or functionality)

  • Add alt text: Provide descriptive alt text for all meaningful images. Decorative images should have empty alt attributes so screen readers skip them.

  • Ensure focus indicators are visible: When a user tabs to an interactive element, it must be visually clear which element has focus. This is one of the most commonly failed WCAG criteria.

  • Avoid text embedded in images wherever possible: Text in images cannot be resized or read by screen readers. 

2. Auditory Design

Accessible audio and video design ensures that users who are Deaf or hard of hearing can access the same content as hearing users, and that users with visual impairments can access video content through audio description.

Best Practices for UX Design:

  • Provide synchronized captions for all video content: Captions must be accurate and not auto-generated without review.

  • Include transcripts for audio: Only content such as podcasts or recorded interviews.

  • Add audio descriptions for video content: Key information should be conveyed visually. WCAG requires audio descriptions for pre-recorded video at Level AA.

  • Avoid autoplay for audio or video: Users should control when media begins.

  • Provide visible alternatives to audio alerts: Flashing icons or notification banners are great alternatives for users who cannot hear audio alerts

3. Navigation and Interaction

Navigation is where motor and cognitive accessibility intersect. 

A significant proportion of users with disabilities rely on a keyboard instead of a mouse to navigate the web. Therefore, every interactive element on your page must be reachable and operable by keyboard alone. 

However, it’s important to be aware of the different types of assistive technology that exist to help users navigate, such as screen readers, switch access devices, and sip-and-puff mouth controllers, and adapt your web design accordingly.

Best Practices for UX Design:

  • Include a skip navigation link: It should appear as the first focusable element on every page. This lets keyboard users bypass repeated navigation to reach the main content directly.

  • Ensure a logical tab order: Tab order should follow the visual layout of the page.

  • Design clear, high-visibility focus indicators: All interactive elements should include links, buttons, inputs, and dropdowns.

  • Avoid keyboard traps: Users who navigate into a component must be able to navigate out of it using standard keys.

  • Do not rely on hover interactions alone: Any information revealed on hover must also be accessible via keyboard focus or another method.

  • Provide alternatives to drag-and-drop:  Drag-and-drop interactions are inaccessible to users without fine motor control. Provide alternative methods to ensure users can perform key interactions.

  • Ensure consistent navigation patterns: Users with cognitive disabilities rely on predictability across pages. Keeping things consistent reduces unpredictability and lowers the cognitive load required to navigate unfamiliar content.

4. Content Structure and Clarity

How content is structured directly affects whether users with cognitive disabilities, screen reader users, and users with low literacy can understand and use it. 

Semantic HTML is the foundation here. Headings must reflect document hierarchy, not just visual styling. Always conduct a check of your headings, labels, and even link text.

Best Practices for UX Design:

  • Use heading levels (H1, H2, H3): Create a logical document outline, not for visual styling. Screen readers use heading structure to allow users to scan and navigate a page.

  • Write descriptive, meaningful link text: Avoid generic text like ‘click here’ or ‘learn more’. Link text should make sense out of context.

  • Use clear, plain language: Where jargon is necessary, define it. Aim for a reading level accessible to a broad audience.

  • Provide text summaries: Long-form content, complex data tables, or detailed infographics should include text summaries.

  • Label all form fields with visible, associated labels: Placeholder text, which disappears when a user starts typing, is not sufficient.

  • Include informative page titles: Titles should describe the purpose of each page. Screen reader users often navigate by page title.

5. Assistive Technology Compatibility

Your designs must be tested with real assistive technologies, not just automated scanners. Screen readers like NVDA, JAWS, and VoiceOver interpret your HTML and CSS and present it audibly. 

If your semantic structure is incorrect or your ARIA usage is faulty, screen reader users will encounter a completely different experience than what you see on screen.

Best Practices for UX Design:

  • Use semantic HTML elements correctly: Buttons for actions, links for navigation, lists for groups of related items.

  • Use ARIA attributes (‘role’, ‘aria-label’, ‘aria-describedby’, ‘aria-expanded’, etc.): Attributes should supplement HTML semantics where native elements are insufficient. Never use ARIA to replace valid HTML where a native element exists. 

  • Ensure custom interactive components are accessible: Modals, tooltips, date pickers, and accordions should be fully keyboard accessible and correctly announce their state to screen readers.

  • Run your design against a free accessibility checker: This helps establish a baseline by identifying surface-level issues before moving to manual testing.

  • Test with actual screen readers on major platforms: For better compliance, use manual testers. Automated tools detect roughly 30–40% of WCAG issues; the rest require expert and assistive technology testing.

6. Feedback and Error Handling

When users make mistakes, whether in forms, checkout flows, or even search inputs, they need to know what went wrong and how to fix it. 

Since inaccessible error handling is a leading cause of task abandonment for users with cognitive and visual disabilities, it’s critical that your website can provide accessible feedback when these errors occur.

Best Practices for UX Design:

  • Display error messages properly: Error messages should appear adjacent to the relevant field, not only at the top of the page.

  • Write error messages in plain language: Messages should explain the problem and how to resolve it. Avoid error codes without explanation.

  • Never use color alone to indicate an error: Use icons, text labels, and clear messaging alongside color cues.

  • Confirm successful actions: Form submissions, uploads, deletions, and other actions should be rewarded with clear, accessible status messages.

  • Give users enough time to complete tasks: Where time limits exist, provide a mechanism to extend them.

    Illustration of a person interacting with a web accessibility toolbar on a computer screen, featuring various icons and tools.

Building Accessibility Into Your Design Process

To achieve great UX design, start strong, keeping the POUR and design practices outlined above at the forefront of your design process. Remember, the most expensive time to address accessibility is at the end of development, while accessibility fixes identified during design cost a fraction of those addressed post-launch. 

Here’s how to build accessibility into each stage.

Discovery and Research

Include users with disabilities in your user research from the start. Personas built without disability representation often lead to designs that treat accessibility as an edge case. Their needs will surface design requirements that would otherwise never appear in your brief. 

Design and Prototyping

Accessible website design is far easier to build when these decisions are documented before a single line of code is written.

  • Run color contrast checks before handing off to development. 

  • Use an accessibility checklist for designers to audit your Figma or Sketch files. 

  • Annotate your designs with accessibility notes: focus order, ARIA roles for custom components, and alt text requirements for images.

Development Handoff

Semantic HTML and correct ARIA implementation begin at handoff.

Developers need explicit guidance on heading hierarchy, form label associations, focus management for dynamic content, and keyboard interaction patterns for custom components. An annotation layer in your design files prevents these being interpreted by default.

Testing

Accessibility testing should happen at every stage, not only at QA. 

Use automated tools to catch surface-level issues early, but supplement with keyboard-only testing and screen reader testing for all key user journeys. Automated accessibility testing tools can identify about 30–40% of WCAG failures; the rest require human judgment. 

For comprehensive coverage, expert accessibility auditing services can provide your business with the depth that automated tools cannot.

Maintenance

Accessibility is not a one-time audit. Every design change, new component, or third-party integration introduces potential accessibility regressions. 

It’s critical that you establish a process for ongoing testing. Use an accessibility management platform to monitor your site continuously and surface new issues as they emerge.

WCAG 2.2 Quick Reference for UX Designers

The full WCAG guidelines(opens in a new tab) run to hundreds of success criteria. The following are the criteria most directly for UX designers during the design phase. 

WCAG Success Criterion

What It Requires

POUR Principle

1.1.1 Non-text Content

All images, icons, and non-text elements must have text alternatives (alt text)

Perceivable

1.3.1 Info and Relationships

Structure conveyed visually (headings, lists, tables) must also be programmatically determinable

Perceivable

1.4.1 Use of Color

Color must not be the only means of conveying information, indicating an action, or distinguishing a visual element

Perceivable

1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum)

Text must have a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1 (3:1 for large text)

Perceivable

1.4.4 Resize Text

Text must be resizable up to 200% without loss of content or functionality

Perceivable

2.1.1 Keyboard

All functionality must be available via keyboard

Operable

2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap

Users who navigate into a component via keyboard must be able to navigate out

Operable

2.4.3 Focus Order

Navigation focus must follow a logical sequence that preserves meaning

Operable

2.4.7 Focus Visible

Keyboard focus must be visually visible on interactive elements

Operable

2.4.11 Focus Appearance (2.2)

Focus indicator must meet minimum size and contrast requirements (new in WCAG 2.2)

Operable

3.1.1 Language of Page

The language of each page must be programmatically determinable

Understandable

3.3.1 Error Identification

Input errors must be identified in text and described to the user

Understandable

3.3.2 Labels or Instructions

All form inputs must have labels or instructions

Understandable

4.1.2 Name, Role, Value

All UI components must have names, roles, and values that can be programmatically determined

Robust

Build Accessibility Into Your Design Team’s Practice Today

Understanding accessibility principles is one thing; consistently applying them across a design team is another. 

If your team is working through accessibility for the first time, structured investing in accessibility training for your designers can help the foundation needed to apply WCAG criteria systematically in Figma, Sketch, or whatever tools your team uses.

Interested in running a baseline audit for your website? Use a free accessibility checker to see where your existing content stands, then connect with the AudioEye team to build a path forward.

At AudioEye, our accessibility platform combines automated monitoring with expert human review to help design and development teams build and maintain accessible products. 

Ready to see AudioEye in Action?

Frequently Asked Questions

Share Article

Ready to test your site's accessibility?